New FLSA Exemption Requirements

Christy Monson

From our November 2016 e-newsletter

As you know, your (non-firefighting and non-public safety) regular employees generally must be paid overtime or earn comp time if they work over 40 hours in a workweek–unless they qualify as “exempt” from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime requirements. Recently, the Department of Labor made some very big changes to the rules regarding which employees qualify as exempt. This means you, as an employer, should review the way in which you categorize FLSA-exempt employees.

Specifically, starting on December 1, only salaried employees who make at least $913 per week (or $47,476 Per Year) may be considered exempt. Now, to be classified as a salaried exempt employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the employee must:

a)     meet the tests for executive, administrative, or professional employees;
b)     be paid on a salary basis; and
c)     starting December 1, 2016, be paid at least $913 per week or $47,476 annually.

What does this mean for you as an employer? Your choices if you have an employee who meets these criteria are:

●     You could increase their salary to at least $47,476 to preserve their exempt status;
●     You could reclassify them as non-exempt and pay them any overtime or credit them with comp time;
●     You could reclassify them as non-exempt and limit their work hours to under 40 per week.

The DOL made other changes to their exempt-status rule regarding how much someone must earn to qualify as “highly compensated” and how to calculate the effect of non-discretionary bonuses on someone’s exempt status. For more information on these recent changes, see:

https://www.dol.gov/whd/overtime/final2016/overtime-factsheet.htm

Written Notice Now Required Before Disciplinary or Performance Review Executive Sessions

Christy Monson

From our November 2016 e-newsletter

The Oregon Ethics Commission has adopted a new rule which changes the law regarding certain executive sessions. Specifically, the Commission decided that in order to call an executive session under ORS 192.660(2)(b) or (i) (which allows a government to go into an executive session to discuss the discipline or performance evaluations of public officers or employees), the public body must:

  • provide written notice of the meeting to the employee or public official at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting;
  • cite the executive session statute in the notice;
  • state in the notice whether the governing body will be considering “the dismissal or disciplining of, hearing complaints or charges against, or reviewing and evaluating the performance of the public official receiving the notice”; and
  • state in the notice that the employee or public official may request an open hearing.

In the past, the law required that governing bodies provide notice, but it did not specify exactly what the notice should say, when it should be given, or that it must be in writing.

~PREPARATION COMES BEFORE SUCCESS~ Tips for Preparing to Bargain your Next Collective Bargaining Agreement

Diana Moffat

From our November 2016 e-newsletter

As most of you know, my email signature line is followed by the adage:

“Preparation comes before success, even in the dictionary.”

That statement is especially true when it comes to preparing to bargain a successor Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) with your union(s).

Do you have a CBA that expires on June 30, 2017? If so, now is the time to prepare. The collective bargaining process can, unfortunately, take many, many months to complete. At best, you are looking at two to five months to get things settled. At worst, much longer! There is a distinct advantage to completing the process, if at all possible, prior to the expiration of the current CBA.

Advantages to early resolution:

If you can resolve your negotiations prior to the expiration of your current CBA, you are not faced with any type of retroactive pay issues. This can go a long way for employee morale of both your employees and your payroll department. Often times, unless bargained otherwise, the retroactive increases reach back to things such as overtime calculations. This can be a small nightmare to your payroll department. And, if you have anything less than fully funded insurance premiums, with an early settlement you are not faced with the danger-zone of figuring out what your “status quo” obligations are under the Public Employee’s Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA) at the time of contract expiration.

You can also use “early resolution” to your advantage in getting a settlement. Employees, and their union can be motivated to get the negotiations behind them and move forward. Once the expiration date comes and goes, that advantage is lost.

If faced with a situation of non-settlement by the date of expiration of the current CBA, you can get to mediation and/or arbitration/impasse shortly after expiration. By July and August, the waiting time to schedule mediation increases. There are only three mediators for the entire State of Oregon!

Timelines to be aware of:

Does your CBA require notice to “open” bargaining? If so, you need to meet that deadline with a notice to the union that you want to bargain for a successor CBA. Most contracts, that have a notification requirement, require notice anywhere from November to January of the final year of the contract.

The required 150-day bargaining period, under the PECBA, does not even begin until the initial proposals have been exchanged. Because of that, early scheduling can be a real advantage. If you are able to develop and present your proposals in November, December or January, you are, at worst, looking at just around the time of contract expiration for the time that you can proceed to mediation if needed.

Development of your proposals should begin sooner, rather than later. Precise contract language is of utmost importance. The development of your proposals should be done in a very thought-out fashion, with input all the way from supervisors, up to council/board members. This process takes time.

Developing your plan:

Preparation requires review of your contract to identify what is working and what needs to be changed. Each management member can give feedback.

Preparation allows you the time to decide if you want to do a comparables analysis, in conformity with the PECBA, to assess your place in the marketplace. This can take a month or, usually, more to complete.

Preparation allows you the time to look at your budget projections for your limitations or wiggle room.

During your preparations you can decide who will be your representative at the bargaining table and who will be on your bargaining team. Do your city council, county commissioners, or executive board need to be advised on the process, the rules and laws that regulate public employee collective bargaining? If so, you will have time to schedule that training. It is important that your governing body understand the rules and obligations which surround bargaining with a public employee union. There can be many danger zones, which they should be aware.

Current “Hot” issues to consider:

There are a number Oregon statutory provisions that apply to your collective bargaining efforts. But there are some very specific upcoming changes that you need to prepare for in your meetings with your union(s). PERS rates are scheduled for another big jump in 2017. Most unions tend to want to ignore these increases as just the cost to the employer of doing business. But the increases are very real cost increases to be included in your negotiations. They definitely impact your budget and they should be considered in your total cost of employee compensation analysis.

And let’s not forget about the ACA Cadillac tax. At this point those new thresholds are scheduled to go into force in January of 2020. Do you have a plan for how you will address the new thresholds? If your new CBA runs from 7/1/17 for three years, your last year of the contract will run into the year 2020. You need to consider your options during your preparation for bargaining.

Finally, the unions are still pushing for Loudermill, Garrity, and Weingarten rules to be put in CBAs, along with other provisions from the Police Officers’ Bill of Rights statute. Are you aware of the dangers of that proposition? You should seek the advice of your labor relations representative in all of these areas.

The Local Government Law Group provides representation to cities, counties and districts in their collective bargaining obligations. We can help you prepare, and bring your required negotiations to conclusion.

Coverage Determinations Can Help You Take Advantage of BOLI Exemptions

Carrie Connelly

From our February 2017 e-newsletter

The phrase is so often repeated it’s nearly cliché – “Construction? Call BOLI.” However, there are a number of exemptions from prevailing wage rate laws. Such exemptions include, but are not limited to, construction projects which cost no more than $50,000, projects that are paid for with no funds of a public agency, and private construction which uses no more than $750,000 of public funds. The ins and outs of determining which projects are and are not exempt from prevailing wage rates can be complex. How can you be sure?

Coverage Determination Requests

Enter coverage determinations. These are letters parties can seek from BOLI regarding whether (or not) a proposed project is a public works subject to prevailing wage rate laws. Obtaining determinations before commencing a project can prevent unexpected costs and unpleasant surprises once a project is underway. And all you have to do is ask. Such a written request should describe all relevant details of the project and provide background documents, records, and other information necessary to enable BOLI to issue its determination. In particular, explain past, present and future property owners and any dates of anticipated ownership transfer. Of course, funding information is critical. Such information must be updated while the determination is pending.

Determinations must issue within 60 days of the request submittal (or BOLI’s receipt of additional information it requests). Upon issuance, parties may seek reconsideration and a hearing in the hopes of a different outcome.

While determinations can be critical to public/private partnerships, they can also be helpful for determining whether a project has been impermissibly divided, whether various phases can be considered independent of the others, or whether a project must be viewed collectively. Such factors are critical in determining the applicability of prevailing wage rate laws.

BOLI Prohibits Dividing Projects to Avoid Prevailing Wage Rates

As noted above, contracting agencies may not divide a project to avoid compliance with prevailing wage rate law. ORS 279C.827. BOLI treats separate contracts for the same project as a single project for prevailing wage rate purposes and may issue an order compelling the violating agency to treat the contracts as a single project.

BOLI looks at a number of factors to decide if separate contracts actually constitute a single project, such as:

  • The physical separation of project structures;
  • Whether a single public works project includes several types of improvements or structures;
  • The anticipated outcome of the particular improvements or structures the agency plans to fund;
  • Whether the structures or improvements are similar to one another and combine to form a single, logical entity having an overall purpose or function;
  • Whether the work on the project is performed in one time period or in several phases as components of a larger entity;
  • Whether a contractor or subcontractor and their employees are the same or substantially the same throughout the particular project;
  • The manner in which the public agency and the contractors administer and implement the project; and
  • Other relevant matters as may arise in any particular case.

If a public works project is of the type described in ORS 279C.800(6)(a)(B) or (C) (i.e., a public/private project), the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries may divide the project if appropriate, considering the above factors, so that the parts of the project that do not include public funds or that will not be occupied or used by the public agency will not be subject to the prevailing wage rate law.

Additionally, if part of a project is publicly owned and parts are privately owned, the Commissioner may divide the project (if appropriate, considering the above factors), so that the parts of the project that are privately owned are not subject to the prevailing wage rate law. Interested parties must submit a coverage determination request to BOLI for assistance with such a division of a project. ORS 279C.827; OAR 839-025-0310; ORS 279C.815.

Conclusion

In sum, prevailing wage rate statutes and rules are complicated. A coverage determination can help you sort out applicable requirements. Also, BOLI has several publications to break the laws down into terms that are more easily understood. These can be found at http://www.oregon.gov/boli/WHD/PWR/docs/2016_PWR_law_book.pdf or obtained via email at pwremail@boli.state.or.us.

Bottom line, before concluding that a particular project is beyond BOLI’s scope-confirm this by contacting your attorney, and/or obtaining a coverage determination.